mastodon.me.uk is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Open, user-supported, corporation-free social media for the UK.

Administered by:

Server stats:

539
active users

#contentwarnings

1 post1 participant0 posts today
Philipp<p>I think I need to enact similar posting and boosting guidelines as <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://ibe.social/@theresmiling" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>theresmiling</span></a></span>.(thanks for sharing them 🙂)</p><p><a href="https://social.anoxinon.de/tags/fediverse" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>fediverse</span></a> <a href="https://social.anoxinon.de/tags/postingGuidelines" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>postingGuidelines</span></a> <a href="https://social.anoxinon.de/tags/ContentWarnings" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ContentWarnings</span></a> <a href="https://social.anoxinon.de/tags/MentalHealth" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>MentalHealth</span></a></p><p><a href="https://theresmiling.eu/blog/2025/03/social-media-use" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">theresmiling.eu/blog/2025/03/s</span><span class="invisible">ocial-media-use</span></a></p>
Kelly (was Claire)<p>Thinking about how many more posts I would boost if there was a button to cleanly CW-boost them. It's a lot.</p><p><a href="https://ohai.social/tags/Mastodon" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Mastodon</span></a> <a href="https://ohai.social/tags/ContentWarnings" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ContentWarnings</span></a></p>
Fishercat<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@benroyce" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>benroyce</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mas.to/@Serenus" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>Serenus</span></a></span> <br>@sandwich</p><p>I don't need CW; I'm finding filters sufficient.</p><p>It's a tough question. I strongly agree that engaging with the world we find ourselves in is our shared responsibility.</p><p>And yet: offensiveness is subjective. Why is it *obviously* appropriate to CW sex and violence, topics that not everyone wants or needs a warning for? </p><p>There's a difference between offense and damage. Framing the question as preferences, or what might offend, makes it easier to ignore the people who say lack of CW harms them. Just as framing masking as a courtesy makes it easier to ignore the folks who say your exhalations might kill them.</p><p>When someone says "I need X to protect myself," a reply that sounds like "Y is perfectly adequate.. you shouldn't need X," strikes me as all kinds of wrong. It smacks of "Well, why don't you just.."</p><p>I expect I'll be inconsistent about my use of CW vs. tags. But I'm not going to be offended by being asked (either generally or directly) to put some stuff behind CWs.</p><p><a href="https://kolektiva.social/tags/ableism" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ableism</span></a> <a href="https://kolektiva.social/tags/contentwarnings" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>contentwarnings</span></a> <a href="https://kolektiva.social/tags/ContentWarnings" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ContentWarnings</span></a> <a href="https://kolektiva.social/tags/courtesy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>courtesy</span></a> <a href="https://kolektiva.social/tags/culture" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>culture</span></a> <a href="https://kolektiva.social/tags/cw" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>cw</span></a> <a href="https://kolektiva.social/tags/hashtags" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>hashtags</span></a> <a href="https://kolektiva.social/tags/mentalhealth" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>mentalhealth</span></a> <a href="https://kolektiva.social/tags/MentalHealth" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>MentalHealth</span></a> <a href="https://kolektiva.social/tags/tags" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>tags</span></a></p>
jeanoappleseed<p>About <a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/tags/ContentWarnings" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ContentWarnings</span></a> aka <a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/tags/CWs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>CWs</span></a><br>About <a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/tags/AutisticPeople" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AutisticPeople</span></a><br>About <a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/tags/Depression" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Depression</span></a> <a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/tags/Anxiety" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Anxiety</span></a> <a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/tags/Autism" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Autism</span></a> <a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/tags/Suicide" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Suicide</span></a></p><p>Did you know that Austistic People are 3 times more likely to die to suicide?<br>Did you know that many Austistic People also suffer at a much higher rate than neurotypicals from countless mental and physical comorbidities including depression, anxiety, heart disease?<br>Did you know that many Austistic People are much more easily overwhelmed than their neurotypical peers?<br>Did you know that many Austistic People are extremelyl troubled and overwhelmed by political news especially these days?<br>DId you know that putting <a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/tags/News" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>News</span></a> items (especially <a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/tags/PoliticalNews" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>PoliticalNews</span></a>) behind a Content Warning (CW) possibly <a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/tags/SavesLives" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>SavesLives</span></a>?</p><p><a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/tags/BeKind" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>BeKind</span></a></p>
Marcus The Board Gamer<p>Unfollowed some accounts. If you can’t use <a href="https://brettspiel.space/tags/ContentWarnings" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ContentWarnings</span></a> for obvious posts that need them then I won’t be following you. It’s fine to talk politics or whatever but stick it behind a CW. That’s the best feature of <a href="https://brettspiel.space/tags/Mastodon" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Mastodon</span></a> (oh and the second best is most of y’all use <a href="https://brettspiel.space/tags/AltText" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AltText</span></a> on images)</p>
Marcus The Board Gamer<p>One of the best things about Mastodon is the <a href="https://brettspiel.space/tags/ContentWarnings" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ContentWarnings</span></a> and y’all are stopping using them and so I’m seeing all sorts of things (that damn picture of you know who doing the you know what is every other post!) that should be behind a CW.</p>
Shouty person<p>I'm discussing <a href="https://wandering.shop/tags/ContentWarnings" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ContentWarnings</span></a> with <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://authorhelp.uk/author/robin/" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>Robin</span></a></span>. There's so much misinformation out there. It occurred to me that some authors seem to think that content warnings are supposed to be like: </p><p>This story is a whodunnit. A murder happens on page 54 when Professor Plum kills Miss Scarlet with a rope in the ballroom.</p>
Jupiter Rowland@<a href="https://social.dhelonious.de/@daniel" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Dr. Daniel Dizdarevic</a> It isn't just because of compression, nor is it because I scale my images down from my original 2100x1400 renderings to 800x533.<br><br>As I've said: I don't describe the image with the things in it. I describe the things. Not as they appear in the image, but as they are in-world where I can walk closer to them or move the camera closer to them. It's like an image with a near-infinite resolution.<br><br>For example, if there's a light grey blob in the image, four pixels wide, three pixels high, I describe it as what it is in-world, a white sign with three lines of black writing on it. I transcribe the text on the sign 100% verbatim including all spelling mistakes, I translate it afterwards if it isn't in English, I may even explain the text if someone out there needs an explanation, and I may go as far as naming and describing the typeface.<br><br>Or if there are two by two pixels on different levels between red and white, I describe them as what they are in-world, a strawberry cocktail in a conical glass, somewhat like a Martini glass. And I slap an "alcohol" content warning on the whole post. Nowadays, I'd even flag the image sensitive just because of these four pixels.<br><br>I used to go as far as describing images within my image and even images within images within my image at higher levels of detail than anyone else would describe their own images. I used to describe things that weren't even visible in-world in the place shown in the image. Pictures of places that I would have to walk or even teleport to to be able to describe them. Textures that I would have to make visible otherwise to be able to see all details.<br><br>The last time I've described an image in an image with details not visible in the place shown in my image was in <a href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/item/136f021c-06cb-4e38-abe6-2bf37fd521d8" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">this post</a>. I used almost 5,000 characters to describe a poster on the info board. I had to walk to the place displayed in the image on the poster to be able to describe it. The description of the image within the image got so lengthy that, when I was done, I had to remind the reader that I'm returning to describing "my" image. And I actually "cheated" by adjusting the camera in such a way that one of the three posters on the info board is entirely concealed behind a tree trunk because it would have been painfully difficult to describe.<br><br>I stopped going that deep when I wrote the image description for <a href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/item/f8ac991d-b64b-4290-be69-28feb51ba2a7" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">what will probably remain my last image post on this channel</a>. The long description was already growing absolutely humongous, and it's my longest one to date with over 60,000 characters. I had actually thought this scene would be easy to describe.<br><br>The problem I encountered was that there were simply too many images within images within my image. There's one teleporter near the left-hand edge with a preview image that made me reconsider. In-world, no matter how close I move the camera to the preview image, it mostly shows a square area that appear to be tan all over except for something dark and unidentifiable in the middle.<br><br>Actually, however, the place shown in the preview image has hundreds of single-destination teleporters. Several dozen of them are activated and have one preview image each of their destination. I teleported there to take closer looks at everything. I was actually about to write a description of that "teleport station" when I realised that I also had to describe every single one of these preview images, at least those that face the camera in the preview image on the teleporter in the place that I was originally describing. And some of these preview images had images in them in turn.<br><br>I would have had to describe probably over a hundred images. In dozens of images. On teleporters which are shown in yet another image on a sub-pixel level. In an image description which was already going out of hand length-wise. On the second day that I was working on that image description. I would have had to teleport at least <em>three times</em> from the place shown in my image to be able to describe these sub-sub-subimages.<br><br>That was when I decided to sacrifice details for convenience and only describe what's visible in-world within the borders of the image, excluding both objects that are entirely obstructed by something else and surfaces that entirely face away from the point of view. I do fully transcribe any text that's partially obstructed, though, although I'm considering two transcripts of such texts, namely one transcript of what's visible and one full transcript for better understanding.<br><br>#<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=Long" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Long</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=LongPost" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">LongPost</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=CWLong" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">CWLong</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=CWLongPost" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">CWLongPost</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=Metaverse" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Metaverse</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=VirtualWorlds" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">VirtualWorlds</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=ImageDescription" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">ImageDescription</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=ImageDescriptions" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">ImageDescriptions</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=ImageDescriptionMeta" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">ImageDescriptionMeta</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=CWImageDescriptionMeta" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">CWImageDescriptionMeta</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=CW" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">CW</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=CWs" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">CWs</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=CWMeta" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">CWMeta</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=ContentWarning" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">ContentWarning</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=ContentWarnings" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">ContentWarnings</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=ContentWarningMeta" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">ContentWarningMeta</a>
Jupiter Rowland@<a href="https://disabled.social/@raphaelmorgan" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Morgan ⚧️</a> Well, what I meant with "do what I do anyway" is not what everyone else does.<br><br>My Fediverse meme posts have fairly standard image descriptions. What may make them long and complex are the explanations. They matter in this context because everyone else would explain meme images in the alt-text, but explanations don't belong into alt-text. And meme posts about Fediverse things do need a lot of explanation if they go beyond Mastodon, and mine tend to go way beyond Mastodon.<br><br><strong>(Content warning: eye contact)</strong> <a href="https://streams.elsmussols.net/item/8829de04-af65-4fa5-a6fa-438103c7d6c8" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">My first attempt at a new meme-posting format on a new, specialised channel</a> was made under the assumption that Mastodon users prefer explanations given to them on a silver platter, right in the post itself which also contains the image. I was told a while ago that external links are bad and inconvenient and probably not accessible, and it's better to explain everything myself.<br><br>I always have to explain the meme template, and especially in this case, I also had to explain the topic. So I ended up with nine explanations on four or five levels with some 25,000 characters altogether, more than half of which went into the two explanations for the topic.<br><br>I couldn't imagine that this was actually what people wanted, seeing as it was generally Mastodon users who seemed to want me to explain everything, but at the same time, it's Mastodon users who complain the most loudly about long posts. And so <a href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/item/aeb3fcf9-48d4-44c8-88e0-b70c2336a512" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">I ran a poll</a> on how people <em>actually</em> wanted meme posts to be explained. At least of the few who voted, nobody wanted explanations in the post if they end up tens of thousands of characters long.<br><br>Ever since, I've delegated the meme template explanations to KnowYourMeme which I link to.<br><br>As for the topic, <strong>(content warning: eye contact, guns)</strong> <a href="https://streams.elsmussols.net/item/400df1f5-1d25-45cd-bfa3-3b4093b9de8a" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">sometimes it needs no explanation</a>. Sometimes ]<strong>(content warning: eye contact, food)</strong> <a href="https://streams.elsmussols.net/item/1e9fa857-db59-4e22-bdaf-f05ff6b0c268" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">it can entirely be covered by links</a>. Sometimes <strong>(content warning: eye contact)</strong> <a href="https://streams.elsmussols.net/item/572473d7-8087-4eb0-8dff-f44519a1c13e" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">I only need a short explanation</a>.<br><br>But in cases like <strong>(content warning: eye contact, swearing)</strong> <a href="https://streams.elsmussols.net/item/641bf10c-a56f-453e-a600-f1ae57a26a53" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">this</a> or <strong>(content warning: eye contact, anger, crying, Japanese swearing)</strong> <a href="https://streams.elsmussols.net/item/ad44e605-618d-48ee-90ae-4bc15c6fa526" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">this</a>, I have to write extensive explanations, even if I can link to a whole lot of external information sources.<br><br>For my original images, renderings from very obscure 3-D virtual worlds, I do much more. I always write two image descriptions for each image.<br><br>One goes into the alt-text, and it's as long as I can make it within the 1500-character limit imposed by Mastodon, Misskey and their forks. And that's the short description that's mostly only there to satisfy the "every image must have alt-text, no matter what" fundamentalists.<br><br>There's also a long description in the post itself which is much, much more detailed. It also contains all necessary explanations which I have to write myself because I can't really rely on external links. And if there's any text anywhere within the borders of the image, legible or not, verbatim transcripts of all these bits of text go into the long description.<br><br>My most recent example, already on my new image-posting channel, but from four months ago, is <strong>(content warning: eye contact)</strong> <a href="https://streams.elsmussols.net/item/b6ae326a-c207-46dd-836b-6bc2b6a3509c" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">this</a>. I've taken care to have as little scenery or surrounding or anything else in the pictures as possible, and still, I ended up with over 20,000 characters of image description. <a href="https://streams.elsmussols.net/item/d67e641f-b1c2-46dd-9843-d1b88d362bb7" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Here</a> I explain why portraits are easier to describe.<br><br>A few examples with scenery, in chronological order, and much longer descriptions, and I consider them all outdated regardless: <strong>(content warning: eye contact, food)</strong> <a href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/item/8c2b4728-dda5-498b-9f84-2f11e163a4a5" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">this</a>, <strong>(content warning: eye contact)</strong> <a href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/item/c8a14063-b4e2-48fa-baf9-cb4faef7225b" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">this</a> and <strong>(content warning: eye contact)</strong> <a href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/item/f8ac991d-b64b-4290-be69-28feb51ba2a7" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">this</a>.<br><br>The first two links also demonstrate how I used to describe pictures within a picture, even on three levels in the case of the second link. But if I had carried on doing this the same way for the image behind the third link, I would have had to describe over a hundred images in various locations on at least four levels. Besides, I would have described details that not only aren't visible in the image, but that aren't visible either in the place shown in the image. Also, this might have revealed eye contact or another trigger of sorts.<br><br>So I decided against describing things that cannot be seen in the shown place. This was the first time that I actually imposed a limitation on myself.<br><br>I could post many, many, many more scenery pictures, maybe even with <em>actual</em> scenery and with many more details. But it would always take me <em>days</em> to describe one of them. The last two image posts I've linked to required two days to write descriptions.<br><br>For example, <a href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/item/2cc2a459-97ce-4fbe-8aa2-86e367b5554e" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">I've been to a New Orleans-themed place</a> a month ago. It would have made for a gorgeous picture report. But it would have taken me at least a week and a half to only describe the four images that Mastodon would let through. In fact, Mastodon would have rejected the post anyway because, with the massive image descriptions, it would have exceeded 100,000 characters by far.<br><br>If you're wondering why my descriptions of virtual world images have to be so long and so detailed, <a href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/item/95b6e36d-7fcd-4791-8cc1-c93e8b9975a3" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">I've written an article about that</a>.<br><br>#<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=Long" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Long</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=LongPost" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">LongPost</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=CWLong" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">CWLong</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=CWLongPost" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">CWLongPost</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=FediMeta" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">FediMeta</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=FediverseMeta" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">FediverseMeta</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=CWFediMeta" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">CWFediMeta</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=CWFediverseMeta" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">CWFediverseMeta</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=AltText" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">AltText</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=AltTextMeta" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">AltTextMeta</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=CWAltTextMeta" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">CWAltTextMeta</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=ImageDescription" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">ImageDescription</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=ImageDescriptions" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">ImageDescriptions</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=ImageDescriptionMeta" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">ImageDescriptionMeta</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=CWImageDescriptionMeta" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">CWImageDescriptionMeta</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=CW" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">CW</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=CWs" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">CWs</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=CWMeta" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">CWMeta</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=ContentWarning" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">ContentWarning</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=ContentWarnings" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">ContentWarnings</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=ContentWarningMeta" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">ContentWarningMeta</a>
Amira Lumina<p>I’m going to piss off a lot of people with this post, so prepare yourself if you’re overly sensitive about life in general. Ready? OK, here goes. I don’t believe in content warnings unless it’s something about cruelty to animals or cruelty to children. If I see someone talking about a mental health issue they are having, or maybe a medical problem they are going through, the last thing I, personally, am going to feel, is triggered by that. I feel empathy, 9 times out of 10. Obviously, just because something doesn’t trigger me, doesn’t mean it wouldn’t trigger other people. But have we really reached a point in society that one human can’t talk about a struggle they are going through without having to warn the rest of humanity? Can we just stop taking other peoples’ struggles as our own? I have been through hell and back in my life, and I can’t imagine getting upset at someone for posting about their own pain without a content warning if it’s something I myself have an understanding of. I’ve literally seen people content warn about positive things, like how they are excited that they’ve reached a goal weight, or how they haven’t self injured in awhile. If it’s posted with a CW, they’re golden, but if they are emotional and forget the CW, it’s almost guaranteed that someone is going to press them about their lack of a CW and I just think that’s so unempathetic and invalidating. Of course we are all different and we are all affected by different things in different ways. But this need for CW’s about every single thing is maddening to me personally. This is just my opinion, nobody has to agree with it. If you feel better posting certain things with a CW, do that for you, not for the rest of humanity. Sensitivity is important but I feel we’ve crossed the line somewhere. <a href="https://toot.cat/tags/contentWarnings" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>contentWarnings</span></a> <a href="https://toot.cat/tags/SorryNotSorry" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>SorryNotSorry</span></a> bout what I said, don’t lose your head</p>
Jupiter Rowland@<a href="https://mastodon.social/users/Mrfunkedude" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Mr. Funk E. Dude</a> The hashtag would be<br><br>#<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=EyeContact" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">EyeContact</a><br><br>And, in addition to the one above, if you really want to drive the point home that the hashtag is there with a content-warning function to a) trigger post-removing/post-rejecting filters, b) trigger post-hiding filters on Mastodon and c) trigger the "NSFW" post-hiding feature on Friendica, Hubzilla, (streams) and Forte:<br><br>#<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=CWEyeContact" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">CWEyeContact</a><br><br>I don't think there's any consensus on whether #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=CW" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">CW</a> and #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=ContentWarning" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">ContentWarning</a> should be used as actual content warning hashtags or for content warning discussions, which should be tagged #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=CWs" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">CWs</a>, #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=ContentWarnings" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">ContentWarnings</a>, #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=CWMeta" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">CWMeta</a> and/or #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=ContentWarningMeta%E2%81%A0" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">ContentWarningMeta⁠</a>, or for both. I mean, apart from #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=CW" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">CW</a> being constantly used for either "continuous wave" in amateur radiotelegraphy or the CW Television network.<br><br>#<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=Long" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Long</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=LongPost" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">LongPost</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=CWLong" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">CWLong</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=CWLongPost" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">CWLongPost</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=FediMeta" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">FediMeta</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=FediverseMeta" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">FediverseMeta</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=CWFediMeta" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">CWFediMeta</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=CWFediverseMeta" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">CWFediverseMeta</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=Fediverse" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Fediverse</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=Mastodon" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Mastodon</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=Friendica" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Friendica</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=Hubzilla" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Hubzilla</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=Streams" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Streams</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=%28streams%29" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">(streams)</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=Forte" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Forte</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=Filters" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Filters</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=FediTips" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">FediTips</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=Hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Hashtag</a> #<a class="" href="https://hub.netzgemeinde.eu/search?tag=Hashtags" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Hashtags</a>
Elena Rossini ⁂<p>🚀 The Future is Federated - issue no.12 👩‍🚀</p><p>"Beyond technical features: why we need to talk about the values of the Fediverse (part 2)"</p><p><a href="https://blog.elenarossini.com/beyond-technical-features-why-we-need-to-talk-about-the-values-of-the-fediverse-part-2/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">blog.elenarossini.com/beyond-t</span><span class="invisible">echnical-features-why-we-need-to-talk-about-the-values-of-the-fediverse-part-2/</span></a></p><p>mentioning: <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@alttexthalloffame" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>alttexthalloffame</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@Gargron" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>Gargron</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://social.growyourown.services/@FediTips" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>FediTips</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://tapbots.social/@ivory" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>ivory</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.online/@IceCubesApp" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>IceCubesApp</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@Tusky" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>Tusky</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://tkz.one/@Simx72" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>Simx72</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://hachyderm.io/@phanpy" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>phanpy</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://henshaw.social/@jon" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>jon</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://ohai.social/@mathi_gwithyas" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>mathi_gwithyas</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mstdn.social/@rysiek" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>rysiek</span></a></span> </p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/TheFutureIsFederated" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>TheFutureIsFederated</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/tech" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>tech</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Fediverse" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Fediverse</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/BigTech" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>BigTech</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/SocialMedia" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>SocialMedia</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/FOSS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>FOSS</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/blog" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>blog</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/accessibility" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>accessibility</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/AltText" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AltText</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/CW" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>CW</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/ContentWarnings" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ContentWarnings</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Phanpy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Phanpy</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Ivory" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Ivory</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Tusky" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Tusky</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Mastodon" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Mastodon</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/IceCubes" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>IceCubes</span></a></p>
Replied in thread
@damon It doesn't help that Mastodon itself is largely a bubble.

Some 70% of all Fediverse users are on Mastodon. But it seems like that within Mastodon itself, at least 95% of all posts originate from Mastodon. Maybe even more.

There are several reasons for this.

First of all, other projects don't federate with Mastodon that much.

Misskey is huge in East Asia, especially Japan. And Japanese Misskey users who hardly know English or not at all won't be interested in connecting with Western Mastodon users, so a large chunk of the second-biggest free project in the Fediverse is out of the equation.

Lemmy is the third-biggest, but Lemmy federates with Mastodon only barely so, also because Lemmy is all about discussion groups and enclosed conversations, both of which Mastodon simply doesn't support. Lemmy users can't follow Mastodon users because Lemmy users can't follow users, full stop. And Mastodon users have to wrap their minds around how to federate with Lemmy. It isn't as straight-forward as communication within Mastodon. And so they simply don't.

Other examples include Hubzilla and (streams) channels having ActivityPub off on purpose to keep ignorant and obnoxious Mastodon users out.

But this goes the other way as well. Mastodon can be outright hostile to non-Mastodon users. Why? Because they don't behave like what Mastodon users are used to from Mastodon and, by extent, partly also Twitter. And they have joined the Fediverse in expectation of something that's one big distributed but homogenous Twitter clone. Anything that deviates from that may be disturbing.

There are Mastodon users who, upon seeing a post with over 500 characters, and be it in the federated timeline, block the poster. This alone cuts into the reach of everything that isn't Mastodon. Not few wish for a switch with which they can permanently filter out all posts with over 500 characters.

Others may block everyone who uses text formatting. Either it simply goes on their nerves. Or they can't imagine that it's even possible to format text in the Fediverse because they can't do that on Mastodon, so they think it's all some Unicode trickery. And as this Unicode trickery is not accessible and inclusive because it irritates screen readers, they deem whoever uses text formatting ableist and therefore blockworthy.

Then there's the issue of content warnings. They must be provided the Mastodon way, or you risk being blocked. However, not everything out there provides a) the right text field with b) the right label on it. Non-Mastodon projects may still label the summary field a summary field instead of a CW field like Mastodon does.

Friendica, for example, has done away with that text field entirely and users BBcode tags instead. Hubzilla doesn't provide any means of adding a summary/a Mastodon CW to a reply. And both have had their own way of adding CWs since long before there was Mastodon which their own users consider vastly superior to Mastodon's way.

In general, boosts are very important on Mastodon. I'd say that most activity on Mastodon is boosts because they're so easy to do on a phone without a hardware keyboard. Your reach on Mastodon depends on boosts.

But if you don't play exactly along Mastodon's written and unwritten rules, and if you don't adhere to the "Fediquette" which is entirely defined by only Mastodon users and geared towards only Mastodon's features (or lack thereof), you're boosted far less.

If you post more than 500 characters at once, it takes a lot for your post to get boosted.

If you post an image without alt-text, the post will be boosted dramatically less because not exactly few Mastodon users refuse to boost image posts without alt-text. You may even be muted or blocked for not providing alt-text. But alt-text only is a thing on Mastodon, and hardly anyone provides it outside Mastodon.

In general, anything that deviates from the standards defined by vanilla Mastodon will cut into your visibility on Mastodon deeply.

CC: @Hiker

#Long #LongPost #CWLong #CWLongPost #FediMeta #FediverseMeta #CWFediMeta #CWFediverseMeta #Fediverse #Mastodon #NotOnlyMastodon #AltText #AltTextMeta #CWAltTextMeta #CW #CWs #CWMeta #ContentWarning #ContentWarnings #ContentWarningMeta #Fediquette
hub.netzgemeinde.euNetzgemeinde/Hubzilla
Replied in thread
@F4GRX Sébastien If I had any way to add another click-to-open level that works on Mastodon as well without mobile users having to deal with their Web browser popping open, I would.

Things would be way easier if sensitive Mastodon users got used to the concept of filters, though, and learned how to set them up. That's one reason for my many hashtags.

But it's strange to see someone from chaos.social irritated by too many CWs.

#Long #LongPost #CWLong #CWLongPost #FediMeta #FediverseMeta #CWFediMeta #CWFediverseMeta #Mastodon #CW #CWs #CWMeta #ContentWarning #ContentWarnings #ContentWarningMeta
hub.netzgemeinde.euNetzgemeinde/Hubzilla
Replied in thread
Hat Friendica aber wieder ein dediziertes Zusammenfassungs-Textfeld? Die alte Dreifaltigkeit Titel, Zusammenfassung, Post?

Ich schrieb ja über Mastodon-Apps und Friendica, daß eine Mastodon-App irgendwas braucht, was genauso funktioniert wie Mastodons CW-Feld. Etwas, wo sie verläßlich immer eine CW reindrücken kann, so daß die dann genauso verläßlich wie auf Mastodon als CW funktioniert. Und zwar, ohne auf irgendwelche projektspezifischen Spezialitäten eingehen zu können.

Die App muß Friendica immer 100% verläßlich blind wie Mastodon "bedienen" können.

Natürlich kann man auf Friendica den Titel als Zusammenfassung/CW nehmen. Aber zum einen muß das eingestellt werden. Zum anderen muß die App dann die CW ins Titelfeld eintragen. Eine Mastodon-App wird aber stur versuchen, die CW ins Zusammenfassungsfeld zu drücken, ob da jetzt eins ist oder nicht.

Wenn sie jetzt die CW ins Titelfeld eintragen soll, dann ist das ein Friendica-Spezialfeature. Wenn sie selbsttätig aus den Einstellungen erkennen soll, ob die CW in den Titel eingetragen oder z. B. als BBcode realisiert werden soll, ist das erst recht ein Friendica-Spezialfeature.

Ich weiß nicht, vielleicht kann Fedilab das. Aber die ganzen praktisch reinen Mastodon-Apps, die von Leuten entwickelt werden, die ihren Lebtag von Friendica noch nie auch nur gehört haben, die können das nicht.

Eine rein gegen Mastodon entwickelte App wird wiederum für Alt-Text ein Textfeld anbieten, das den Alt-Text in ein Bild einträgt, das an einen Post als Datei angehängt ist. So läuft das nämlich auf Mastodon und nur so.

Mein letzter Informationsstand ist, daß genau das aber auf Friendica nicht geht. Wenn man da Alt-Text haben will, muß man das Bild erst hochladen, dann in-line in den Post einbetten und dann den Alt-Text in den BBcode eintragen.

Theoretisch ginge das auch mit einer App. Aber das wäre wieder ein Friendica-Special-Feature. Und eine reine Mastodon-App von einem Entwickler, der Friendica überhaupt nicht kennt, unterstützt keine Friendica-Special-Features, sondern wirklich nur und ausschließlich Sachen, die Mastodon kann und die Mastodon genau so macht.

#Long #LongPost #CWLong #CWLongPost #LangerPost #CWLangerPost #FediMeta #FediverseMeta #CWFediMeta #CWFediverseMeta #CW #CWs #CWMeta #ContentWarning #ContentWarnings #ContentWarningMeta #AltText #AltTextMeta #CWAltTextMeta #Friendica #MastodonApp #MastodonApps
hub.netzgemeinde.euNetzgemeinde/Hubzilla

Should a content warning include some indication of what's inside?

If it doesn't, does it still empower people to choose what content they are exposed to?

If it does, does that upset people before they get to make a choice?

Seems there are problems either way 🤔

Fed up with not being able to boost great toots that don't have content warnings?

Here's a bookmarklet that will let you add a content warning and repost the toot in seconds:

👉 mastodoncontentmover.github.io

Hope it helps—please boost for reach, and let me know how it works for you!🙏🧡

p.s. It's the first version; all (civil) feedback and bug reports welcome. I've tested it successfully in my versions of Firefox and Edge.

mastodoncontentmover.github.ioMastodonRetootBookmarklet